All selected work
06

Integration, identity, and infrastructure

Institutional Application Portal & Single Sign-On

A portal approach that makes independent institutional applications accessible through a shared workspace and unified identity experience.

StagingEN06 / 14
01

Institutional context

Applications operated by different teams and infrastructures had their own data, role, and deployment boundaries. Users still needed a secure and understandable way to reach the right application.

02

My contribution

  • Connected independent applications through a shared portal and identity flow.
  • Prepared integration boundaries that preserve source-application permissions.
  • Developed administration views for invitations, identity reviews and release gates.
03

Problem

Combining applications through one database or cross-domain session cookie would create security and maintenance risks, while separate sign-in screens fragmented the user experience.

Constraints

  • Preserving each application’s data and authorization boundary
  • Transferring identity safely across different hosting environments
  • Never auto-linking ambiguous or conflicting identities
  • Failing closed when an integration is not ready
A secure handoff from shared identity to an application’s own authorization decision
  1. 01User
  2. 02Institutional identity
  3. 03Portal
  4. 04Signed context
  5. 05Source application role
04

Approach

A federation model was chosen instead of a shared database or cross-domain session. The portal verifies identity and transfers a short-lived signed context; the source application continues to make its own role decision.

05

Solution built

The design includes a shared institutional shell, application catalog, deep links, federated sign-in flow, adapter health checks, and a controlled account-linking process for conflicts.

06

For management

  • Invite users and assign portal roles
  • Set application-level access scope
  • Review conflicting identity matches
  • Follow integration and application release gates
07

Institutional impact

Users gain one starting point while independent applications retain ownership of their data, authorization model, and deployment lifecycle.

08

Technical scope

  • Federated identity and signed transfer
  • Application catalog and deep links
  • Source-application role preservation
  • Identity matching and conflict control
  • Adapter health and configuration gates
  • Independent deployment and rollback

Next case study

07Race Registration & Results Management

Let’s discuss a similar problem

We can examine the current workflow in your institution and identify the real operational bottleneck together.

can_mrsly@hotmail.com